Your duty did not change
The evidence required to discharge it did. DSI 001 produces the independently assessed, contemporaneous record a board needs to answer the three accountability questions for an autonomous system, through the structures it already uses.
The accountability standard did not move
The test a court applies after an adverse outcome is unchanged: who held authority, what did they know, what did they do.
Governance that exists on paper but is not exercised does not discharge the duty, a principle the authorities articulate for directors generally and which applies by analogy to autonomous-system oversight.
Seven obligations, one assessment
| Board obligation | DSI 001 output | Reporting artefact |
|---|---|---|
| Know what is deployed | Registry and dimensional profile | Decision System Registry |
| Understand autonomy | D1 Autonomy Gradient | Autonomy and Authority Summary |
| Challenge management | Independent GBI assessment | Independent Governance Assessment Report |
| Monitor controls | GCI, exercised in practice | GCI Dashboard |
| Oversee liability | D4 and multiplier conditions | Liability Architecture Summary |
| Keep pace | D6 and reassessment triggers | Reassessment and Lifecycle Summary |
| Keep records | EIS-01 evidence tiers | Evidence Tier Report |
The questions the GBI answers
The expectation is explicit: CPS 230 contract compliance is due 1 July 2026, and the April 2026 AI letter calls for board oversight of AI as an enterprise risk. (Regulatory position as at [25 June 2026].)
Bring an assessment to the board
Commission a DSI 001 assessment and table the board paper alongside the registry, the autonomy summary and the independent assessment report.