You can assess a vendor’s SOC 2
You cannot yet assess whether its system is governed. DSI 001 gives procurement, risk and legal teams a portable, system-level governance signal to decide whether an AI-enabled vendor is adequate for the use case, and on what conditions.
The asymmetry in vendor risk
A decision, not a label
The GBI band supports a procurement decision. The buyer still owns the decision; the score reduces the need to reconstruct the vendor’s governance from first principles.
| GBI band | Classification | Procurement posture it supports |
|---|---|---|
| At or below 1.75 | Certified | Accept; treat as a governed dependency, monitor at cadence |
| At or below 2.50 | Compliant | Accept with conditions; set terms and reassessment triggers |
| Above 2.50 | Assessed | Require remediation, or defer, with a re-test before approval |
| Unclassified | None | Reconstruct governance yourself, or decline |
The questions the GBI answers about a vendor
Some AI providers or embedded AI-dependent vendors may meet the material service provider threshold depending on the service, its criticality and the buyer context. CPS 230 contract compliance is due 1 July 2026. (Regulatory position as at [25 June 2026].)
Put a GBI in your vendor submissions
Require a classification in AI-vendor submissions, or assess a vendor you are evaluating.